WAPPP Fellow Jia Xue, PhD Candidate in Social Welfare at the
University of Pennsylvania, presented her work on domestic violence, social
media, and mental health in the Chinese context.
To begin, she described two cases of domestic
violence in China: in the first, a Chinese woman, married at 26, was severely
beaten by her husband. She called the police at least eight times, but they
refused to intervene on the grounds that domestic violence was a “family
matter.” The woman ultimately died in 2008 after ten months of marriage because
of the abuse. In the other, an American woman married a Chinese man who was a
famous English teacher. When her husband began abusing her, she also reported
to the police who said that they could not assist her. She decided to post
pictures of her injuries on Weibo, often described as China’s Twitter. Within
an hour, her post had been retweeted 10,000 times and had received 4,000
comments. With the help of activists on social media, she launched a landmark
case against her husband and received compensation for the abuse.
While these two cases differ on many grounds, the use of
social media to speak out against abuse caught Jia’s eye. Weibo was established
in 2010 and grew quickly, so that by the time the American woman chose to speak
out in 2011, there was an established social media community to bring public
scrutiny to her case. Social media, according to Jia, has changed the public
from consumers of information to producers of information, telling the
government and the media what they think should be on the policy agenda.
The growth of social media in China has been astronomical. More
than half of all internet users are Chinese, and almost 90% of the Chinese
population owns a mobile phone. Weibo is the leading Chinese social network and
boasts more than 600 million users.
While many terms are used to describe domestic violence in
the United States – including intimate partner violence, violence against
women, and gender-based violence – domestic violence is the sole term used in
China, and refers specifically to physical harm perpetrated by current family
members. Domestic violence in the Chinese context does not include violence by
former partners or among same-sex couples. While there is no national
representative survey of domestic violence in China, the All-China Women’s
Federation estimates that one-third of married women have experienced domestic
violence in their lifetime.
Jia pointed out a twenty-year lag between the U.S. and China
in terms of domestic violence legislation. The U.S. first passed the Violence
Against Women Act in 1994. The Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in
1995 raised awareness about the issue of domestic violence, but the first
provincial regulation against it was not released until 2000, in Hunan. In
2001, domestic violence was mentioned for the first time in a national-level
law. Finally, after many years of advocacy, a national domestic violence law
was passed in 2015, to be implemented in March 2016.
Jia’s research is at the intersection of violence and social
media, using computational, big-data approaches to examine domestic violence. One
of her current projects is to explore (re)tweeting behavior of domestic
violence topics on Twitter. Using topic modeling to summarize and categorize
tweets, it became clear that organizational Twitter accounts discuss domestic
violence in the context of advocacy, while individual Twitter accounts are more
likely to discuss high-profile individual cases, like those about sports or
movie stars.
In a separate study, she examined the correlation between use of
traditional or contemporary media and prevalence rates of domestic violence. Survey
respondents who were more likely to read books experienced fewer incidents of
violence, while those who had higher levels of internet use reported more
domestic violence. Jia hypothesized that more time spent online reduces
communication between couples, which leads to marital tension, though the
reverse could be true: in relationships with a higher incidence of violence,
individuals may spend more time on the internet to be away from their spouse.
The seminar audience also pointed out that there could be a generational
effect: older survey respondents may be less likely to use the internet and
less likely to categorize certain behaviors as domestic violence. Alternatively,
there could be salience bias in this sample: survey respondents who spend more
time online and consume more international news may have learned more about the
issue of domestic violence and have a different view of the issue than those
who consume more traditional media sources.
Jia described one final study on using social media to
explore the impact of domestic violence on mental health in China. One
limitation of existing studies is that domestic violence is unpredictable; it
is difficult to measure mental health before and after an incident of domestic
violence. With Weibo, researchers have a corpus of posts from individuals over
a long period of time and can isolate messages before and after a given
incident to examine the impacts of domestic violence on depression, suicidal
ideation, and life satisfaction. Jia and
her colleagues amassed data from 1.6 million users, a
total of 5 billion posts. The researchers selected posts based on nine types of
domestic violence keywords and then manually screened posts to ensure that the
poster was describing a personal incident. Ultimately, 644 posts were
identified as real domestic violence cases. The next step was for the
researchers to identify whether the post described the poster’s first
experience of domestic violence, including if the post clearly stated that this
was the first experience (approximately 70% of posts) or that the poster had
never experienced domestic violence before (15%). Ultimately, the researchers
ended up with 232 unique Weibo posts. Finally, the researchers selected a group
of 232 Weibo users with no domestic violence experience and matched them to the
existing pool based on gender and location.
For the four weeks prior to and after the first-time
incident of domestic violence, the researchers used natural language processing
and behavioral features to create a prediction model of users’ levels of
depression, suicidal ideation, and life satisfaction. The two matched groups did not show any
significant differences in mental health before the domestic violence incidents,
and the non-victim group did not show any significant changes in mental health
over the eight-week period. For Weibo
users who experience intimate partner violence, 40% were more depressed after
the incident, but there were no significant impacts on suicidal ideation or
life satisfaction. Posters who experienced abuse from their parents
demonstrated lower life satisfaction after the first-time event. Those who were
exposed to domestic violence but were not themselves the victim had a higher
rate of suicidal ideation and lower life satisfaction.
There are certain limitations of this study: researchers have
to rely on profile information, and there may be a selection bias for posters
who are willing to describe their experience on social media. However, this
study was able to show short-term mental health impacts after incidents of
domestic violence using innovative methods. These research findings may spur
additional research or policy interventions for prevention.
No comments:
Post a Comment